Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: experience at an epilepsy centre.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications.

Estereoelectroencefalografía en la evaluación prequirúrgica de epilepsias focales refractarias: experiencia de un centro de epilepsia / Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: Experience at an epilepsy centre

Objetivo: La estereoelectroencefalografía (E-EEG) es una técnica de evaluación prequirúrgica en pacientes con epilepsia focal refractaria de difícil localización (EFRDL) que permite explorar con electrodos profundos regiones cerebrales de difícil acceso y la profundidad de la corteza. Esta técnica, en auge en centros internacionales, apenas se ha desarrollado en España. Describimos nuestra experiencia con la E-EEG en la evaluación de pacientes con EFRDL. Material y métodos: En los últimos 8 años, 71 pacientes con EFRDL fueron evaluados con E-EEG en nuestro centro. Analizamos prospectivamente los resultados obtenidos en la localización, los resultados quirúrgicos y las complicaciones asociadas a la técnica. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 30 años (rango 4-59 años), 27 pacientes eran mujeres (38%). La RM cerebral fue negativa en 45 pacientes (63,4%). Se implantaron 627 electrodos (mediana de 9 electrodos por paciente, rango 1-17), con un 50% de implantaciones multilobares. En 64 (90,1%) pacientes se localizó la zona epileptógena (ZE), siendo extratemporal o temporal plus en el 66% de los casos. En 55 pacientes de los 61 intervenidos el seguimiento fue superior al año: en el último año de seguimiento 32/55 pacientes (58,2%) estaban libres de crisis (Engel I) siendo los resultados favorables (Engel I-II) en el 76,4% de las intervenciones. Tres pacientes (4,2%) presentaron una hemorragia cerebral. Conclusión: La E-EEG permite localizar la ZE en pacientes en quienes anteriormente no era posible, ofreciendo unos resultados quirúrgicos superiores a otras técnicas invasivas y una tasa de complicaciones relativamente baja. (AU)

Objective: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. Material and methods: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. Results: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. Conclusion: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications. (AU)

[Treatment of epilepsy with perampanel: conversion from add-on therapy to monotherapy]. / Tratamiento de la epilepsia con perampanel: desde la terapia añadida a la conversión a monoterapia.

INTRODUCTION: Perampanel (PER) is an antiepileptic drug approved in Europe as add-on therapy for patients with focal onset seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) from the age of 4 years, and for primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures from 7 years of age. OBJECTIVE: Review current evidence on treatment with PER monotherapy after conversion from adjunctive therapy. DEVELOPMENT: Two retrospective multicentre studies in which PER was used as monotherapy show that low doses (6-8 mg/day) of PER were effective and well tolerated in a subgroup of patients with less severe epilepsies than patients who participated in clinical trials (where PER was used as add-on therapy). In these studies, the retention rate exceeded 90% at 3 months, and 70% at 6, and 12 months. The responder rate was > 75% at 3 months, and the rate of seizure-free patients exceeded 50% at 3 and 6 months, and 37% at 12 months. Compared to other observational studies and clinical trials where PER was used as add-on therapy, no adverse effects other than those already known were observed. Four other studies examining the effects of conversion to PER monotherapy in a small number of patients support these results. CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, conversion to PER monotherapy, at relatively low doses, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with focal and generalised tonic-clonic seizures.

TITLE: Tratamiento de la epilepsia con perampanel: desde la terapia añadida a la conversión a monoterapia.Introducción.El perampanel (PER) es un fármaco anticrisis epilépticas aprobado en Europa como terapia añadida para pacientes con crisis de inicio focal (con o sin crisis focal a bilateral tonicoclónica) desde los 4 años, y para las crisis tonicoclónicas generalizadas desde los 7 años. Objetivo. Revisar la evidencia existente sobre el tratamiento con PER en conversión a monoterapia. Desarrollo. Dos estudios multicéntricos retrospectivos en los que el PER se convirtió a monoterapia muestran que este fármaco en dosis bajas (6-8 mg/día) fue especialmente eficaz y bien tolerado en un subgrupo de pacientes con epilepsias menos graves que los pacientes que participaron en los ensayos clínicos en donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida. En estos estudios, la tasa de retención superó el 90% a los tres meses y el 70% a los seis y a los 12 meses. La tasa de respondedores fue > 75% a los tres meses, y la tasa de pacientes libres de crisis llegó a superar el 50% a los tres y a los seis meses, y el 37% a los 12 meses. En comparación con otros estudios donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida, no se observaron efectos adversos diferentes a los ya conocidos. Otros cuatro estudios que examinaron los efectos del PER en conversión a monoterapia en un número pequeño de pacientes apoyan estos resultados. Conclusiones. En la práctica clínica habitual, el PER es un tratamiento eficaz y bien tolerado cuando se usa en conversión a monoterapia, en dosis relativamente bajas, en pacientes con crisis focales y tonicoclónicas generalizadas.

Tratamiento de la epilepsia con perampanel: desde la terapia añadida a la conversión a monoterapia / Treatment of epilepsy with perampanel: conversion from add-on therapy to monotherapy

Introducción: El perampanel (PER) es un fármaco anticrisis epilépticas aprobado en Europa como terapia añadida para pacientes con crisis de inicio focal (con o sin crisis focal a bilateral tonicoclónica) desde los 4 años, y para las crisis tonicoclónicas generalizadas desde los 7 años. Objetivo: Revisar la evidencia existente sobre el tratamiento con PER en conversión a monoterapia. Desarrollo: Dos estudios multicéntricos retrospectivos en los que el PER se convirtió a monoterapia muestran que este fármaco en dosis bajas (6-8 mg/día) fue especialmente eficaz y bien tolerado en un subgrupo de pacientes con epilepsias menos graves que los pacientes que participaron en los ensayos clínicos en donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida. En estos estudios, la tasa de retención superó el 90% a los tres meses y el 70% a los seis y a los 12 meses. La tasa de respondedores fue > 75% a los tres meses, y la tasa de pacientes libres de crisis llegó a superar el 50% a los tres y a los seis meses, y el 37% a los 12 meses. En comparación con otros estudios donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida, no se observaron efectos adversos diferentes a los ya conocidos. Otros cuatro estudios que examinaron los efectos del PER en conversión a monoterapia en un número pequeño de pacientes apoyan estos resultados. Conclusiones: En la práctica clínica habitual, el PER es un tratamiento eficaz y bien tolerado cuando se usa en conversión a monoterapia, en dosis relativamente bajas, en pacientes con crisis focales y tonicoclónicas generalizadas.(AU)

Introduction: Perampanel (PER) is an antiepileptic drug approved in Europe as add-on therapy for patients with focal onset seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) from the age of 4 years, and for primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures from 7 years of age. Objective: Review current evidence on treatment with PER monotherapy after conversion from adjunctive therapy. Development: Two retrospective multicentre studies in which PER was used as monotherapy show that low doses (6-8 mg/day) of PER were effective and well tolerated in a subgroup of patients with less severe epilepsies than patients who participated in clinical trials (where PER was used as add-on therapy). In these studies, the retention rate exceeded 90% at 3 months, and 70% at 6, and 12 months. The responder rate was > 75% at 3 months, and the rate of seizure-free patients exceeded 50% at 3 and 6 months, and 37% at 12 months. Compared to other observational studies and clinical trials where PER was used as add-on therapy, no adverse effects other than those already known were observed. Four other studies examining the effects of conversion to PER monotherapy in a small number of patients support these results. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, conversion to PER monotherapy, at relatively low doses, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with focal and generalised tonic-clonic seizures.(AU)

Cannabidiol para el tratamiento del síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut y del síndrome de Dravet: recomendaciones de expertos sobre su uso en la práctica clínica en España / Cannabidiol for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome: experts recommendations for its use in clinical practice in Spain

Introducción: El cannabidiol (CBD) es uno de los componentes principales de la planta del cannabis que ha demostrado efecto ante las crisis epilépticas. Tras su desarrollo clínico, obtuvo su aprobación por la Agencia Europea del Medicamento en septiembre de 2019 para el tratamiento de las crisis epilépticas asociadas con el síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut (SLG) y el síndrome de Dravet (SD), en combinación con el clobazam (CLB), en pacientes a partir de los dos años. Objetivo: Establecer unas recomendaciones de manejo del CBD derivado de la planta altamente purificado consensuadas por expertos españoles en el tratamiento de la epilepsia para su uso en pacientes con SD y SLG, basándose en su experiencia clínica y en la evidencia científica. Desarrollo: Reunión de consenso de un grupo de cuatro neurólogos y neuropediatras españoles expertos en el manejo de la epilepsia asociada al SD y el SLG y con experiencia clínica en el uso de CBD. Se debatió sobre diferentes áreas, incluyendo la posología (dosis de inicio, pauta de escalada), la eficacia (valoración de resultados e indicaciones para la suspensión del tratamiento) y la seguridad (evaluación, interacciones entre fármacos, manejo de efectos adversos). Conclusiones: Para optimizar el tratamiento con CBD, se recomienda una pauta lenta de escalada de dosis (de cuatro semanas o más) hasta alcanzar la dosis máxima recomendada o el efecto deseado, reducir los fármacos anticrisis epilépticas concomitantes si aparecen efectos adversos por interacciones y mantener el tratamiento al menos seis meses si se tolera. La eficacia y la seguridad del CBD deben evaluarse de forma individual, considerando el beneficio y el riesgo para cada paciente.

Introduction: Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of the main components of the cannabis plant that has demonstrated anti-epileptic seizure effect. Following its clinical development, in September 2019 the European Medicines Agency approved its indication for the adjunctive therapy of epileptic seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS), combined with clobazam (CLB), in patients of 2 years of age and older.Aim: To establish recommendations on the use of plant-derived highly purified CBD on which Spanish experts have reached consensus for the treatment of epilepsy in patients with DS and LGS based on their clinical experience and the scientific evidence. Development: Consensus meeting with the participation of four Spanish neurologists and neuropediatric who are experts in epilepsy secondary to DS and LGS and with clinical experience in the use and management of CBD. They discussed on several topics, including posology (starting dose, dose escalation schema), efficacy (assessment of outcomes and indications for treatment withdrawal), and safety (evaluation, drug-drug interactions, adverse events management). Conclusions: In order to optimise CBD treatment, a slow dose escalation (≥ 4 weeks) is recommended until the maximum recommended dose or the desire effect is reached. It is also recommended that the concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) be reduced in case of adverse events due to interactions, and that the treatment continues for at least 6 months if it is well tolerated. The efficacy and safety of CBD must be assessed individually, considering the benefits and risks for individual patients.(AU)

Cannabidiol en los síndromes de Dravet y Lennox-Gastaut: un nuevo abordaje terapéutico / New therapeutic approach in Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome with cannabidiol

Introducción: Los síndromes de Dravet (SD) y Lennox-Gastaut (SLG) son dos síndromes epilépticos graves y de inicio en la edad pediátrica, refractarios al tratamiento, asociados a un notable incremento en las tasas de mortalidad y comorbilidades respecto a la población general. Suponen un fuerte impacto en la vida de los pacientes y sus familiares, ya que los pacientes están sometidos a múltiples terapias farmacológicas (muchas sin indicación específica), con cambios frecuentes debido a la escasa eficacia y a los efectos adversos. Los especialistas que les atienden destacan las necesidades no cubiertas y la falta de tratamientos específicos, seguros y eficaces para un mejor manejo de la enfermedad. Desarrollo: Se ha reunido un grupo formado por cuatro neurólogos especialistas en epilepsia para hacer una revisión de la literatura científica y evaluar los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de la solución oral de cannabidiol en el tratamiento de estos síndromes, tanto en ensayos clínicos aleatorizados como en diversos estudios observacionales. Conclusiones: El cannabidiol se sitúa como una terapia innovadora que permite un mejor control de las crisis epilépticas y comorbilidades del SD y el SLG; además, su eficacia y seguridad han sido evaluadas en más de 700 pacientes. En los ensayos clínicos redujo significativamente el porcentaje de crisis convulsivas y de caída en comparación con placebo en los pacientes con SD y SLG, respectivamente, y puede mejorar su calidad de vida y la de sus familiares. Los efectos adversos más frecuentes fueron la somnolencia y la disminución del apetito. También se notificaron niveles elevados de aminotransferasas hepáticas, especialmente en pacientes tratados concomitantemente con ácido valproico. Esta terapia podría permitir un mejor control de las crisis epilépticas asociadas a estas patologías.(AU)

Introduction: Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) are two serious epileptic syndromes with paediatric onset which are refractory to therapy and are associated with an important increase in mortality rates and comorbidities compared to the general population. These pathologies have a strong impact on the lives of patients and their families, because they undergo multiple pharmacological therapies (many of them without specific indication), with frequent changes due to poor efficacy and associated adverse effects. The specialists who care for these patients highlight unmet needs and the lack of specific, safe and effective treatments for better management of the syndrome. Development: A group of four neurologists specializing in epilepsy has met to review the scientific literature and evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral solution cannabidiol in the treatment of these syndromes, both in randomized clinical trials (CT) and in some observational studies. Conclusions: Cannabidiol is positioned as an innovative therapy that allows better control of epileptic seizures and comorbidities of DS and LGS, furthermore its efficacy and safety have been evaluated in more than 700 patients. In CTs, cannabidiol significantly reduced the percentage of convulsive seizures and drop seizures compared to placebo in patients with DS and LGS respectively, which could improve their quality of life and that of their family members. The most frequent adverse effects reported were somnolence and decreased appetite. Elevated liver aminotransferase levels were also reported, especially in patients given concomitant sodium valproate. This therapy may allow better control of the epileptic seizures associated with these syndromes.(AU)

Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: Experience at an epilepsy centre. / Estereoelectroencefalografía en la evaluación prequirúrgica de epilepsias focales refractarias: experiencia de un centro de epilepsia.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications.

Ascertaining the epidemiology, patient flow and disease management for Dravet syndrome in Spain. / Determinacion de la epidemiologia, el flujo de pacientes y el tratamiento del sindrome de Dravet en España.

INTRODUCTION: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, drug resistant epilepsy that starts very early in life with febrile seizures followed by cognitive impairment and diverse seizure types. AIM: To generate evidence on the epidemiology of DS, its diagnosis, patient-flow, treatment and unmet needs from the perspective of Spanish experts. DEVELOPMENT: A two-round Delphi study involving 19 physicians was conducted. Questionnaires were based on literature review and validated by clinical experts. Consensus was reached when topics were subject to routine clinical practice and individual experience, or the coefficient of variation among answers was <= 0.3. The estimated number of new DS patients is 73 per year. Prevalence is estimated to be between 348-540 patients. DS is mostly diagnosed in children. Survival varies from 5 to 60 years. There is no standardised follow-up of patients beyond the age of 18 and mortality rates are uncertain. No standard guidelines exist for diagnosing or treating DS. It takes 9 to 15 months to confirm the diagnosis and genetic testing is unevenly available. Valproic acid, clobazam, stiripentol and topiramate are commonly used. Poor efficacy and safety are the main reasons for treatment switch. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of DS in Spain is not well known and several areas of unmet needs still exist. Experts' views offer a starting point for further research into the reality of DS in Spain. Epidemiological studies, consensus criteria, easy access to genetic testing, treatment options, training and research into quality of life aspects are highly needed.

TITLE: Determinacion de la epidemiologia, el flujo de pacientes y el tratamiento del sindrome de Dravet en España.Introduccion. El sindrome de Dravet (SD) es una epilepsia rara y resistente a los farmacos que comienza en etapas muy precoces de la vida con convulsiones febriles, seguidas de deterioro cognitivo y diversos tipos de crisis epilepticas. Objetivo. Generar datos objetivos sobre la epidemiologia del SD, su diagnostico, el flujo de pacientes, el tratamiento y las necesidades no cubiertas desde el punto de vista de expertos españoles. Desarrollo. Se efectuo un estudio Delphi de dos rondas en el que participaron 19 medicos. Los cuestionarios se basaron en una revision de la bibliografia y fueron validados por expertos clinicos. Se alcanzo consenso si los temas se referian a la practica clinica habitual y la experiencia individual, o si el coeficiente de variacion entre las respuestas era <= 0,3. El numero estimado de pacientes nuevos con SD es de 73 al año. La prevalencia se calcula entre 348 y 540 pacientes. El SD se diagnostica principalmente en niños. La supervivencia varia entre los 5 y los 60 años. No existe ningun seguimiento normalizado para los pacientes de mas de 18 años de edad, y las tasas de mortalidad son inciertas. No existen guias normalizadas para diagnosticar o tratar el SD. Se tarda de 9 a 15 meses en confirmar el diagnostico, y la disponibilidad de los analisis geneticos es irregular. Normalmente se utilizan el acido valproico, el clobazam, el estiripentol y el topiramato. La escasa eficacia y la seguridad son los motivos principales de los cambios de tratamiento. Conclusiones. La epidemiologia del SD en España es poco conocida, y sigue habiendo necesidades no cubiertas en algunas areas. Las opiniones de expertos suponen un punto de partida para poder investigar la realidad del SD en España. Los estudios epidemiologicos, los criterios de consenso, el acceso facil a las pruebas geneticas, las opciones de tratamiento, la formacion y la investigacion de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud constituyen todos ellos aspectos muy necesarios.

[«Apuntes en Neurologia¼ (Notes in Neurology): a synthesis of the evidence on common paroxysmal neurological disorders and on neurodegenerative disorders]. / «Apuntes en Neurologia¼: una sintesis de la evidencia en trastornos neurologicos comunes paroxisticos y en trastornos neurodegenerativos.

«Apuntes en Neurologia¼ is an initiative in which prominent national and international leaders, with broad academic recognition, came together to synthesise the most outstanding clinical aspects within their area of interest and to discuss the latest developments in a more accessible language. Understanding the factors that affect the onset and progression of any neurological disease through a review is important to be able to develop strategies to reduce the burden of these diseases. Moreover, knowledge of the clinical aspects is essential to solve the problems of daily clinical practice. The data collected here reflect the weight of evidence and some of them anticipate a promising future in the treatment of these diseases. This first edition focuses on common paroxysmal neurological disorders such as migraine, epilepsy and sleep disorders, as well as neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment. These are clearly different pathologies, although some of them such as migraine and epilepsy, may share clinical symptoms. Sleep disorders, however, are important manifestations of neurodegenerative diseases that are sometimes clinically apparent long before the onset of other neurological symptoms. After recalling pathophysiology and diagnosis, the current review focuses on bringing together the main advances in five of the major neurological diseases.

TITLE: «Apuntes en Neurologia¼: una sintesis de la evidencia en trastornos neurologicos comunes paroxisticos y en trastornos neurodegenerativos.«Apuntes en Neurologia¼ es una iniciativa en la cual lideres de primera linea nacional e internacional, con amplio reconocimiento academico, se reunieron para sintetizar los aspectos clinicos mas destacables dentro de su area de interes y acercar las novedades en una lengua mas proxima. Entender los factores que afectan al inicio y progresion de cualquier enfermedad neurologica a traves de una revision es importante para el desarrollo de estrategias en pro de reducir la carga de estas enfermedades, y conocer los aspectos clinicos es esencial para poder resolver los problemas de la practica clinica diaria. Los datos aqui recogidos reflejan el peso de la evidencia y algunos de ellos anticipan un futuro prometedor en el tratamiento de estas enfermedades. Esta primera edicion se centra en trastornos neurologicos comunes paroxisticos como la migraña, la epilepsia y las alteraciones del sueño, y en trastornos neurodegenerativos como la enfermedad de Parkinson y el deterioro cognitivo. Se trata de patologias claramente diferentes, si bien algunas de ellas, como la migraña y la epilepsia, pueden compartir sintomatologia clinica. Los trastornos del sueño, por su parte, son manifestaciones importantes de enfermedades neurodegenerativas que, en ocasiones, son clinicamente evidentes mucho antes del inicio de otros sintomas neurologicos. Tras recordar la fisiopatologia y el diagnostico, la revision actual se centra en acercar los principales avances en cinco de las principales enfermedades neurologicas.

Retrospective study of perampanel efficacy and tolerability in myoclonic seizures.

OBJECTIVES: Perampanel is an antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for add-on treatment of focal seizures (with or without generalization) and primary generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures. Our objective was to explore the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients with drug-resistant myoclonic seizures, after failure of other AEDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Data were collected from individual patient clinical files and analysed using appropriate descriptive statistics and inferential analyses. RESULTS: Data are reported for 31 patients with mean age 36.4 years, who had an average epilepsy duration of 18 years, previously taken an average of 5.03 AEDs, and were taking an average of 2.4 AEDs on perampanel initiation. Patients exhibited myoclonic, GTC, absence, tonic and focal seizures, and most had associated cognitive decline and/or ataxia. Median time on perampanel was 6 months, most common dose was 6 mg, and overall retention rate was 84%. The responder rate for myoclonic seizures was defined via reduction of days with myoclonic seizures per month. At 6 months, 15 (48.4%) of the 31 patients were classed as myoclonic seizure responders, 10 (32.3%) were myoclonic seizure free, and 39% saw improvements in functional ability. Of 17 patients with GTC seizures at baseline, 9 (53%) were responders at 6 months, and 8 (47.1%) were seizure free. The most frequent side effects were psychiatric disorders, instability, dizziness and irritability, and mostly resolved with dose reduction. Five patients discontinued perampanel due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel caused clinically meaningful improvements in patients with drug-resistant myoclonic seizures. It was generally well tolerated, but psychiatric and neurological side effects sometimes required follow-up and dose reduction.

Specificity of electroclinical features in the diagnosis of ring chromosome 20.

BACKGROUND: Ring chromosome 20 (R20) syndrome is a chromosomal disorder characterized mainly by drug-resistant frontal lobe seizures, recurrent nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), and typical EEG features. The aim of this study was to investigate if this triad is common and specific to all patients with R20. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study (from 2000 to 2011), we selected patients who fulfilled at least two out of three criteria: drug-resistant frontal lobe seizures, recurrent NCSE, and characteristic electroencephalography (EEG) features. In all patients, diagnosis was based on karyotype analysis of at least 100 metaphases. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients who met at least two of the selected criteria: six patients (16.7%) with R20 and 30 (83.3%) without R20 (non-R20). All patients with R20 met all three criteria. Eleven (36.7%) patients without R20, however, also displayed the full triad. In 19 patients without R20 (63.3%), one of the three clinical features was missing: frontal lobe seizures were not resistant to antiepileptic drugs (AED) in four (13.3%), recurrent NCSE was missing in six (20%), and nine (30%) patients did not have typical EEG features. Based on this data, specificity was 63.3%, positive predictive value was 35.3%, and sensitivity and negative predictive values were 100%. Additionally, a review of all publications describing the R20 phenotype revealed that 81.98% of patients with R20 display the full electroclinical triad. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, all patients with R20 displayed the three electroclinical characteristics. This is in line with previous reports (presenting high sensitivity and negative predictive value). However, these features can also be observed in other epilepsies and are not specific to R20. Our findings suggest that in the presence of the full triad of symptoms, karyotype analysis focused on chromosome 20 should be conducted.

Introducción / Introduction

No disponible

Validez de las escalas clínicas y de contenido del Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota-2 para el diagnóstico de crisis no epilépticas psicógenas / Validity of the clinical and content scales of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

Introducción: La utilidad del Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) para el diagnóstico de crisis no epilépticas psicógenas (CNEP) es controvertida. Este estudio analiza la validez de las escalas clínicas y, a diferencia de trabajos previos, las escalas de contenido. Métodos: Estudio transversal de 209 pacientes atendidos en la unidad de epilepsia. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística tomando como prueba de referencia la vídeo-electroencefalografía y como variables predictoras edad, sexo, cociente intelectual y las escalas clínicas (modelo A) o de contenido (modelo B) del MMPI-2. Los modelos se seleccionaron según el índice de Aikake y se compararon con el test de DeLong. Resultados: Se analizó a 37 pacientes con CNEP solas o combinadas con crisis epilépticas y 172 pacientes solo con crisis epilépticas. El modelo A, compuesto por sexo, hipocondría (Hs) y paranoia (Pa), mostró una sensibilidad del 77,1%, una especificidad del 76,8%, un porcentaje de clasificación correcta del 76,8% y un área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0,836 para el diagnóstico de CNEP. El modelo B, compuesto por sexo, preocupación por la salud (HEA) y miedos (FRS), mostró una sensibilidad del 65,7%, una especificidad del 78,0%, un porcentaje de clasificación correcta del 75,9% y un AUC de 0,840. El test de DeLong no detectó diferencias significativas. Conclusiones: El MMPI-2 presenta una validez moderada para el diagnóstico de CNEP en los pacientes remitidos a una unidad de epilepsia. El uso de las escalas de contenido no mejora de forma significativa los resultados obtenidos con las escalas clínicas

Introduction: The use of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) is controversial. This study examines the validity of the clinical scales and, unlike previous works, the content scales. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 209 patients treated in the epilepsy unit. We performed a logistic regression analysis, taking video-electroencephalography as the reference test, and as predictor variables age, sex, IQ and clinical (model A) or content scales (model B) of the MMPI-2. The models were selected according to the Aikake index and compared using the DeLong test. Results: We analyzed 37 patients with PNES alone, or combined with seizures, and 172 patients with seizures only. The model consisting of sex, Hs (hypochondriasis) and Pa (paranoia) showed a sensitivity of 77.1%, a specificity of 76.8%, a percentage of correct classification of 76.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.836 for diagnosing CNEP. Model B, consisting of sex, HEA (health concerns) and FRS (fears), showed a sensitivity of 65.7%, a specificity of 78.0%, a percentage of correct classification of 75.9% and an AUC of 0.840. DeLong's test did not detect significant differences. Conclusions: The MMPI-2 has a moderate validity for the diagnosis of PNES in patients referred to an epilepsy unit. Using content scales does not significantly improve results from the clinical scales

Validity of the clinical and content scales of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.

INTRODUCTION: The use of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) is controversial. This study examines the validity of the clinical scales and, unlike previous works, the content scales. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 209 patients treated in the epilepsy unit. We performed a logistic regression analysis, taking video-electroencephalography as the reference test, and as predictor variables age, sex, IQ and clinical (model A) or content scales (model B) of the MMPI-2. The models were selected according to the Aikake index and compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: We analyzed 37 patients with PNES alone, or combined with seizures, and 172 patients with seizures only. The model consisting of sex, Hs (hypochondriasis) and Pa (paranoia) showed a sensitivity of 77.1%, a specificity of 76.8%, a percentage of correct classification of 76.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.836 for diagnosing CNEP. Model B, consisting of sex, HEA (health concerns) and FRS (fears), showed a sensitivity of 65.7%, a specificity of 78.0%, a percentage of correct classification of 75.9% and an AUC of 0.840. DeLong's test did not detect significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The MMPI-2 has a moderate validity for the diagnosis of PNES in patients referred to an epilepsy unit. Using content scales does not significantly improve results from the clinical scales.

Epilepsia resistente a fármacos antiepilépticos: recomendaciones de actuación diagnóstica y terapéutica en España / Drug-resistant epilepsy: current recommendations for diagnosis and treatment in Spain

Introducción: La epilepsia resistente a fármacos antiepilépticos (ERF) constituye un problemasocio-sanitario de primer nivel, que debe ser individualizado precozmente por sus dramáticas repercusiones individuales y colectivas.Desarrollo: Recientemente, la Liga Internacional Contra la Epilepsia ha definido la ERF como aquella en la que no se controlen las crisis tras haber tomado de forma adecuada dos fármacos antiepilépticos apropiados y bien tolerados, entendiendo como falta de control la aparición de crisis en un año o en un tiempo inferior a tres veces el intervalo entre crisis que mostraba antesde iniciar el tratamiento. Esta sociedad internacional recomienda en todo paciente con ERF una evaluación rápida y detallada en una unidad de epilepsia. Se entiende como Unidad Clínica de Epilepsia (UCE) el conjunto de profesionales que actuando en colaboración tienen como objetivo primario el diagnóstico y tratamiento del paciente con epilepsia. Las UCE en España pueden ser estratificadas en distintos niveles, dependiendo de la actividad que se desarrolle en cada una de ellas. La consulta específica de epilepsia se considera como el germen de toda UCE, siendo necesaria la figura del experto en epilepsia. En las UCE médicas se realiza la monitorización vídeo-EEG prolongada. En las UCE médico-quirúrgicas además se realiza cirugía de epilepsia de dificultad diversa. Conclusiones: Todas las UCE deben cooperar con protocolos consensuados, debiendo existir un flujo bidireccional entre ellas. La estratificación de las UCE permite una alta eficacia y eficiencia, debiendo existir el suficiente número que garantice el fácil acceso de todos los pacientes con epilepsia (AU)

Introduction: Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a top-priority social health problem which requires early individual treatment due to its dramatic repercussions for the patient and society. Development: The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has recently defined DRE as that in which the seizures are not controlled after having correctly taken two appropriate and well tolerated anti-epileptic drugs, with lack of control being understood as the appearance of seizures within one year or in a period less than three times the inter-seizure interval before starting treatment. This International Society recommends a rapid and detailed assessment of all patients in an Epilepsy Unit. A Clinical Epilepsy Unit (CEU) is understood as a group of professionals who, acting in collaboration, have the diagnosis and treatment of the patient with epilepsy as their primary objective. CEUs in Spain may be stratified into different levels depending on the activity carried out in each of them. The specific epilepsy clinic is considered the fundamental type of CEU and includes the necessary figure of an expert in epilepsy. Prolonged video-monitoring is performed in medical CEUs. In medical-surgical CEUs epilepsy surgery with varying degrees of difficulty is also performed. Conclusions: All CEUs must cooperate with consensus protocols, and there must be a two-way flow between them. Stratification of CEUs increases efficacy and efficiency, due to there being a sufficient number of them to ensure easy access by all patients with epilepsy (AU)

Consenso de las Recomendaciones de Actuación diagnóstica y Terapéutica sobre Epilepsia resistente a fármacos antiepilépticos en España (Consenso RATE-España) / Consensus-recommended diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for drug-resistant epilepsy in Spain (Consenso RATE-España)

Objetivo: Conocer la opinión de un colectivo de expertos en epilepsia y elaborar un consenso sobre la definición de epilepsia resistente a fármacos (ERF) según la Liga Internacional Contra la Epilepsia (ILAE) y los distintos niveles asistenciales al paciente con ERF en España. Material y métodos: El estudio fue realizado utilizando el método Delphi, mediante dos rondas sucesivas de cuestionarios. Un comité científico confeccionó un documento preliminar y catorce preguntas relacionadas y fueron remitidos por correo electrónico al panel de expertos. Se incluían ítems relacionados con el concepto de ERF, niveles asistenciales e itinerario entre dichos niveles de los pacientes con ERF. Resultados:Contestaron el cuestionario 41 expertos. Se alcanzó acuerdo sobre la necesidad y aplicabilidad de la definición de ERF según la ILAE, necesidad de la existencia del experto en epilepsia, consulta específica de epilepsia y unidades clínicas de epilepsia con diversa estratificación, según la graduación de actividades que se realicen. Existió moderado consenso con la dotación y actividad de las unidades clínicas de referencia y no hubo consenso sobre la remisión de pacientes que han presentado una crisis epiléptica a una consulta de epilepsia. Conclusiones: El panel de expertos estuvo de acuerdo con la definición de ERF según la ILAE y en remitir a todo paciente con ERF a un estudio pormenorizado a una consulta de epilepsia o unidad clínica de epilepsia. Se resalta la necesidad de la monitorización vídeo-EEG en el estudio del paciente con ERF y el proponer otras formas terapéuticas en pacientes seleccionados (AU)

Objective: To ascertain the opinions of an Epilepsy Expert Group and prepare a consensus document on the definition of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the different healthcare levels for the patient with epilepsy in Spain. Material y methods: The study was conducted using the Delphi method, by means of successive rounds of questionnaires. A scientific committee prepared a preliminary document and fourteen associated questions, which were sent by e-mail to the panel of experts. They included items related to the concept of DRE, health care levels and the route between these levels for patients with DRE. Results: A total of 41 experts answered the questionnaire. They agreed regarding the necessity and applicability of the DRE definition according to the ILAE, the need for an expert panel on epilepsy, specialist epilepsy clinics, and clinical epilepsy units stratified depending on the level of activities they carried out. There was moderate consensus on the resources and activity of the clinical units of reference and there was no consensus on the referral of patients who have suffered an epileptic seizure to an epilepsy clinic. Conclusions: The expert panel agreed with the definition of DRE according to the ILAE and on referring patients with DRE for a detailed study in an epilepsy clinic or epilepsy clinical unit. They highlighted the need for video-EEG monitoring in the study of patients with DRE and the need to propose other forms of treatment in selected patients (AU)

Drug-resistant epilepsy: current recommendations for diagnosis and treatment in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a top-priority social health problem which requires early individual treatment due to its dramatic repercussions for the patient and society. DEVELOPMENT: The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has recently defined DRE as that in which the seizures are not controlled after having correctly taken two appropriate and well tolerated anti-epileptic drugs, with lack of control being understood as the appearance of seizures within one year or in a period less than three times the inter-seizure interval before starting treatment. This International Society recommends a rapid and detailed assessment of all patients in an Epilepsy Unit. A Clinical Epilepsy Unit (CEU) is understood as a group of professionals who, acting in collaboration, have the diagnosis and treatment of the patient with epilepsy as their primary objective. CEUs in Spain may be stratified into different levels depending on the activity carried out in each of them. The specific epilepsy clinic is considered the fundamental type of CEU and includes the necessary figure of an expert in epilepsy. Prolonged video-monitoring is performed in medical CEUs. In medical-surgical CEUs epilepsy surgery with varying degrees of difficulty is also performed. CONCLUSIONS: All CEUs must cooperate with consensus protocols, and there must be a two-way flow between them. Stratification of CEUs increases efficacy and efficiency, due to there being a sufficient number of them to ensure easy access by all patients with epilepsy.

Consensus-recommended diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for drug-resistant epilepsy in Spain (Consenso RATE-España).

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the opinions of an Epilepsy Expert Group and prepare a consensus document on the definition of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the different healthcare levels for the patient with epilepsy in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted using the Delphi method, by means of successive rounds of questionnaires. A scientific committee prepared a preliminary document and fourteen associated questions, which were sent by e-mail to the panel of experts. They included items related to the concept of DRE, health care levels and the route between these levels for patients with DRE. RESULTS: A total of 41 experts answered the questionnaire. They agreed regarding the necessity and applicability of the DRE definition according to the ILAE, the need for an expert panel on epilepsy, specialist epilepsy clinics, and clinical epilepsy units stratified depending on the level of activities they carried out. There was moderate consensus on the resources and activity of the clinical units of reference and there was no consensus on the referral of patients who have suffered an epileptic seizure to an epilepsy clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The expert panel agreed with the definition of DRE according to the ILAE and on referring patients with DRE for a detailed study in an epilepsy clinic or epilepsy clinical unit. They highlighted the need for video-EEG monitoring in the study of patients with DRE and the need to propose other forms of treatment in selected patients.

Socio-occupational and employment profile of patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy has a significant impact on quality of life. Many studies have observed higher unemployment rates among patients with epilepsy. However, unemployment rates vary according to the clinical conditions, country, and group studied. METHODS: Between October 2007 and February 2008, we performed a cross-sectional multicenter epidemiological study to evaluate the socio-occupational and employment profiles of 872 adult patients with epilepsy followed in outpatient epilepsy clinics in Spain. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of the patients were employed at the time of the survey, 10.9% of the patients were unemployed, and 12.5% were occupationally incapacitated. CONCLUSION: Patients with epilepsy had employment rates similar to those of the general population, and slightly higher levels of unemployment. The main factors associated with unemployment and incapacity were the presence of refractory epilepsy, the occurrence of a seizure in the last 12 months, level of education, and polytherapy.